|
Post by Muramasa on Feb 22, 2007 14:27:47 GMT -8
Well, it's not like they didn't allude to an alien race in the previous games, and EA's "creative borrowing" certainly has been establish, so I wouldn't be too suprised if what you said was the case.
I missed out on Total Annihilation. Seen any of the reviews yet?
|
|
|
Post by Inaaca on Feb 22, 2007 14:30:25 GMT -8
MY LIFE FOR AIUR!
|
|
|
Post by Kuat on Feb 22, 2007 18:03:27 GMT -8
Well, it's not like they didn't allude to an alien race in the previous games, and EA's "creative borrowing" certainly has been establish, so I wouldn't be too suprised if what you said was the case. I missed out on Total Annihilation. Seen any of the reviews yet? Yeah, but some are slanted (such as IGN who SELLS THE GAME via their direct drive service; the wiki page also gets adbot edited). What it boils down to: Proz: -My sort of RTS. Insane micromanagement, that is. So yeah, maybe not to everyone a pro. -Lots of unit types -Apparently, it's fun. Sorta important for a game. -OMG GRAFIX! KHHHAAAAAANNNNS: -OMG SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS! This computer would make Dr. Ribak blush. The comp that fits the minimum requirements could run two instances of that CRAK game MW goes on about. And solitaire. Etc, etc. -Steep learning curve. Slope approximately infinity.
|
|
|
Post by The Dankness on Feb 22, 2007 18:55:53 GMT -8
The comp that fits the minimum requirements could run two instances of that CRAK game MW goes on about. With it's requirement of 80,000,000,000 RAM? I highly doubt that. Besides, the worlds greatest scientists in the year 2050 hooked up 300 computers into one super computer to try and run it, and it still didn't work. (It destroyed the computer, too.)
|
|
|
Post by Kuat on Feb 22, 2007 20:32:40 GMT -8
The comp that fits the minimum requirements could run two instances of that CRAK game MW goes on about. With it's requirement of 80,000,000,000 RAM? I highly doubt that. Besides, the worlds greatest scientists in the year 2050 hooked up 300 computers into one super computer to try and run it, and it still didn't work. (It destroyed the computer, too.) It actually requires avagadro's number of DDR50 DIMMULTRAPOWER RAM. TO THE EXTREME. Sorry, but it has your game beat.
|
|
|
Post by The Dankness on Feb 22, 2007 21:21:10 GMT -8
Sorry, but it has your game beat. We shall see...
|
|
|
Post by Kuat on Feb 22, 2007 22:00:41 GMT -8
Sorry, but it has your game beat. We shall see... Or we won't, because no computer in our lifetimes can run either. Nor our in our progeny's lifetime. Nor their progeny, etc, etc.
|
|
|
Post by The Dankness on Feb 22, 2007 22:04:57 GMT -8
Or we won't, because no computer in our lifetimes can run either. Nor our in our progeny's lifetime. Nor their progeny, etc, etc. Well, according to CRAK lore, CRAK: The Computer Game should be playable by the year 2350. Look forward to that year, my friends! BWAHAHAHAHAHA!
|
|
|
Post by Kuat on Feb 22, 2007 22:22:39 GMT -8
Or we won't, because no computer in our lifetimes can run either. Nor our in our progeny's lifetime. Nor their progeny, etc, etc. Well, according to CRAK lore, CRAK: The Computer Game should be playable by the year 2350. Look forward to that year, my friends! BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Oh, sorry, I didn't notice the mistake I made. The one where I said that you'd have progeny. Quite an error of the greatest magnitude if I do say so myself. And if you did have "progeny", I don't think the byproduct of you and your hand would be fertile. So the second part would then indeed be false. I apologize for my mistakes. Sloppy, I know. Speaking of progeny, I'd sure like to perpetuate the species with this gal: www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceSxEjwXHcM
|
|
|
Post by You probably can't touch this. on Feb 22, 2007 22:59:55 GMT -8
I like her back up band.
Two guys with acoustics.
|
|
|
Post by The Dankness on Feb 22, 2007 23:36:07 GMT -8
Well, according to CRAK lore, CRAK: The Computer Game should be playable by the year 2350. Look forward to that year, my friends! BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Oh, sorry, I didn't notice the mistake I made. The one where I said that you'd have progeny. Quite an error of the greatest magnitude if I do say so myself. And if you did have "progeny", I don't think the byproduct of you and your hand would be fertile. So the second part would then indeed be false. I apologize for my mistakes. Sloppy, I know. Speaking of progeny, I'd sure like to perpetuate the species with this gal: www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceSxEjwXHcM
|
|
|
Post by Muramasa on Feb 23, 2007 0:46:37 GMT -8
Perhaps this discussion gives new meaning to the term "go fuck yourself"?
|
|
|
Post by You probably can't touch this. on Feb 23, 2007 0:48:06 GMT -8
Comedy gold.
|
|
|
Post by Muramasa on Feb 23, 2007 0:50:33 GMT -8
Incidentally, I wonder if they based Yuna's newfound pop nature from Final Fantasy 10-2 off of Alizee. Back on topic, I've had this song stuck in my head the entire day: www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XX6J1YXO0k
|
|
|
Post by You probably can't touch this. on Feb 23, 2007 0:53:14 GMT -8
I would think she's more based on the fantasies of 12 year old girls than anything.
/equips pony
|
|
|
Post by Muramasa on Feb 23, 2007 0:55:25 GMT -8
I don't know, for some reason, I can't help but to think that target demographic also includes 13-18 teenage boys as well.
Eh, tis' been a while since I was a little girl myself.
|
|
|
Post by You probably can't touch this. on Feb 23, 2007 1:00:48 GMT -8
Bah, most 13-18 boys are probably drowning it out with some lame Linkin Park tune or something.
I know I would be but with Smashing Pumpkins. \m/
|
|
|
Post by Muramasa on Feb 23, 2007 1:06:34 GMT -8
I drowned it out with a mixture of ravens revenge and pixie sticks rolled in a fruit rollup.
|
|
|
Post by You probably can't touch this. on Feb 23, 2007 1:13:28 GMT -8
Which explains your cocaine addiction.
|
|
|
Post by Muramasa on Feb 23, 2007 1:17:24 GMT -8
Hmm, you might be right, but I think I need a second opinion. Coyote, what do you say about this? Well, damn...
|
|