|
|
Post by You probably can't touch this. on Jan 29, 2007 11:46:32 GMT -8
Just as much as Kuat hates the Socratic method, I hate the hell out of Descartes even more. I also especially hate non-philosophy students that take my Philosophy courses and think he is hard.
If anyone would like to read some philosophy that doesn't say anything apart from a two word sentance, please, read some Descartes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Muramasa on Jan 29, 2007 13:42:14 GMT -8
I won't. You suck. We think.
Anyways, I didn't realize you taught classes. Are your a TA or do you mean "happen to take the same classes as I"?
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain Galaxy on Jan 29, 2007 13:59:36 GMT -8
So... why do you hate him?
I think he meant people that are in the same class as his, I initially thought the same thing as you, but then I realized that's not what he meant.
|
|
|
|
Post by You probably can't touch this. on Jan 29, 2007 15:11:59 GMT -8
I'm a hold hand, nowadays, they're MY classes!
|
|
|
|
Post by You probably can't touch this. on Jan 29, 2007 15:13:10 GMT -8
So... why do you hate him? Because you can't really have exciting discussions over statements of the obvious. |
|
|
|
Post by Muramasa on Jan 29, 2007 23:59:38 GMT -8
Of course you can.
Hey, there is an o between the g and o in "Googly". ZOMG!!
|
|
|
|
Post by You probably can't touch this. on Jan 30, 2007 19:14:35 GMT -8
Yep, there is.
*cricket*
|
|
|
|
Post by Muramasa on Jan 31, 2007 0:02:44 GMT -8
Those crickets sure have six legs. And they make such a loud noise.
|
|
|
|
Post by Muramasa on Jan 31, 2007 14:25:58 GMT -8
Googly, you never respond to my posts. What happened to US, Googly?!
|
|
|
|
Post by You probably can't touch this. on Jan 31, 2007 21:19:19 GMT -8
I saw you responding with that other guy.
YOU AND I ARE THROUGH! *puts on Cure album*
|
|
|
|
Post by Muramasa on Feb 1, 2007 0:14:50 GMT -8
What? I saw you talking to those other dudes all the time, and the ONE freaking time that I do it, you get your panties in bunch?! Well you know what? Screw you, screw you and your little dog and goldfish too.
|
|
|
|
Post by You probably can't touch this. on Feb 1, 2007 13:15:23 GMT -8
Descartes' philosophy: I think.
|
|
|
|
Post by Muramasa on Feb 1, 2007 17:11:37 GMT -8
Therefore, you is.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dis on Feb 2, 2007 13:13:55 GMT -8
I am, therefore I think. Boing
|
|
|
|
Post by Muramasa on Feb 2, 2007 14:21:17 GMT -8
I think you don't think, therefore you aren't.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Dankness on Feb 2, 2007 14:39:08 GMT -8
I think you think that you don't think, therefore you think that I think you don't think that I think that you think that I don't think.
|
|
|
|
Post by Muramasa on Feb 2, 2007 14:43:55 GMT -8
I guess. Therefore, I only exsist as an ethereal being.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Dankness on Feb 2, 2007 14:44:47 GMT -8
I assume. Therefore, I exist for everyone, whether they want me to or not.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dis on Feb 2, 2007 15:38:19 GMT -8
You exist for everyone? So if I want you to make me a sandwich, you'll do it? After all, you exist for other people.
|
|
|
|
Post by You probably can't touch this. on Feb 2, 2007 17:25:44 GMT -8
Actually, the statement of "I think, therefore, I am" is a poor argument because the conclusion is already assumed in the premise. It basically says "I exist and am thinking, therefore, I exist." Just replace "think" with any other verb you can think of it will be undoubtedly correct as that premise is made unimportant as the conclusion is assumed in the first premise of "I." |
|
