|
|
Post by Kuat on Jan 4, 2008 11:06:12 GMT -8
How could they hand down such a harsh verdict to such good boys? One boy got a whole 5 years! Gosh and golly gee! That's insane, yes! Why, that boy would be released at the retirement age of England, 23! |
|
|
|
Post by Captain Galaxy on Jan 4, 2008 11:17:03 GMT -8
I think they should've gotten less, I mean, they have such good character and no previous convictions.
|
|
|
|
Post by You probably can't touch this. on Jan 4, 2008 16:53:22 GMT -8
What's wrong, Californians? Want to try them as adults as you are so historically fond of?
Also, not to be a spelling nazi (pun intended), but it is "fascist."
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain Galaxy on Jan 4, 2008 18:41:51 GMT -8
What's wrong, Californians? Want to try them as adults as you are so historically fond of? Also, not to be a spelling nazi (pun intended), but it is "fascist." No dude, he meant facist, as in pertaining to the face. Seriously, get your words right. And do you really seriously think that five years isn't too little? |
|
|
|
Post by You probably can't touch this. on Jan 4, 2008 19:14:43 GMT -8
No, I believe that we should give them a life sentence. All 60 to 70 years left of it. Totally a win/win situation.
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain Galaxy on Jan 4, 2008 19:27:01 GMT -8
Right, you're right. Because prison systems aren't based around a philosophy of improving the self-esteem (once you make a mistake, there's no chance for redemption) of inmates, but making them feel like crap instead, so doing that for 60 to 70 years will be the perfect punishment. Better yet, they should just kill them.
|
|
